Monday, March 28, 2011

Chapel of Awareness business?

Tourists traveling in the area made an unwitting observation about how the Friends of Chapel appear to be changing Chapel of Awareness's direction into business and not a nonprofit church.

The photo above has a note attached saying "They were having a cute gallery shop, so we popped in". (dated March 12th) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/orignauxmoose/5545080034/)

The church's new leadership has been sending out notices about rummage sales (including one that was planned for March 5th), but then some church members got a message promoting an art show for Donald Schwartz. The note posted by the tourists seems to indicate that what they saw was not an art show but a "gallery shop". That sounds like a storefront, not an event. (Note also that nowhere in the promotion for the art show, or even the rummage sales, is there an indication of any proceeds going to the church as a fund-raiser)

Before the Friends of Chapel took over, Chapel of Awareness had set up a store, but it was for parishioners with all proceeds going to the church as a fundraiser. It was not a storefront for the public.

What steps has the new Chapel leadership taken to make sure that they are operating a storefront properly under the auspices of a non-profit church? As usual, who knows?

Given the Friends' placement of Chapel of Awareness under a large number of online "business" listings (not religious), and now with the creation of this "store" and a book without showing how Rev. Gene Larr's church is benefiting, the appearance is that the new church leadership is moving Chapel of Awareness towards a for-profit business, in Chapel Guardian view.

There isn't necessarily anything wrong with that, as long as it is done legally and transparently to the congregation. No matter what, as of now the focus is becoming confusing.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

You don’t have to go to Chapel of Awareness anymore …

… because all the basics to Chapel of Awareness philosophy are apparently now contained in a single book called “In the Beginning: A Spiritualist’s Bible”, a book claiming to be the ultimate compilation of work by the late Rev. Eugene C. Larr, the Chapel’s founder.

Did it not occur to author Donald Schwartz and those he thanked in the book’s acknowledgments that by publishing the entire lecture series, among other materials, they have effectively ended the purpose of Chapel itself?

Why attend live presentations of the Beginning Lecture Series or Sunday Services when you can buy the book and read at your leisure, anywhere, anytime?

In Chapel Guardian point of view, the publishing of this book puts Chapel’s purpose in jeopardy. There’s no point in “answering your spiritual knock” when you don’t even need to approach the door anymore.

The book outright acknowledges that “for more than 30 years, Rev. Larr refused to have his classes, lectures, and lessons published in print. He remained concerned that misinterpretation and misrepresentation would ensue” (page 11).

Rev. Larr is absolutely right.

All one need do is look at the “interpretations” and claims of channeling found in the “The Season”, an occasional publication of the “new” Chapel of Awareness. An example:

Rev. Nell Rose Smith is stated to have channeled the Chapel’s founder (as published in the Winter 2010/11 “Season”). The “channel” seems to reveal Rev. Larr to be morose on spirit-side: “When I focused only on money, then I saw only the poverty of my life” … “When I focused only on my goals and achievement, I saw only my failures,” the publication quotes “Rev. Larr” as saying. Who among Chapel members would honestly think that Rev. Larr only focused on money in life when church donations – on principle – were practically discouraged, and membership was free to 5 dollars for three decades? Who among Chapel members honestly believe that Rev. Larr only saw failures when he built an organization that only the rarest of individuals can? These words warrant critical analysis. As Rev. Larr himself insisted, as a scientist.

Instead of following Rev. Larr’s wisdom, the “Bible” authors (and we use plural because it is clear that this material was put together not by Donald Schwartz alone) claim that “Gene was finally convinced” to publish. That very well might be true, given the heavy handed tactics we have seen from the Friends of Chapel group which alienated many of the congregation.

In fact, the Friends of Chapel who paved the way for this book are mostly the ones who sued Rev. Larr’s own creation. By name in the book (page vii), they are acknowledged: Rev. Eric Berg, Rev. Sherry DeLoach, Rev. Don Miller, Rev. Bob Sisler, Rev. Nell Rose Smith, Debra Bernath, Marie Dardarian, Helene Dorian, Monica Hagen, Melissa Hall, Ernie Linkous, Wanda Olson, Dietmar Rothe, Suzanne Sisler, Drucilla (Kubicka) Thiercof, and Sheri Wachstetter.

Also distressing is that the copyright of the book (2011) is listed solely as that of the late Donald R. Schwartz. Chapel Guardian must assume that any royalties from the book are going to his estate and those who run it. The new Chapel of Awareness leadership (mostly those acknowledged in the book) have yet to provide any explanation as to how Chapel of Awareness benefits from the publication of this material. Donations? Royalties? How will Rev. Larr’s organization survive?

The Beginning Lecture Series and other materials were also part of Chapel’s legacy. Any claim by Rev. Larr’s organization appears to have been wiped out by the publication, based on Chapel Guardian reading of the book’s copyright notice. The book even goes so far as to publish the church’s precepts (page 1). Does that now make Chapel of Awareness itself beholden to Schwartz’s estate?

In the end, the struggle around the publishing of the “Bible” isn’t so much about Rev. Larr’s philosophy itself. It’s about how it’s being treated, and the very fear Rev. Larr had most – that people would misinterpret and misuse this information.

Perhaps the best example of this can be found in Rev. Bob Sisler’s forward (page 9), in which Sisler concludes: “One last thing to remember, the book isn’t about Rev. Larr, it’s about you! (sic)”

No. It’s not all about “you”. It’s about all of us. In this case, it’s also about Rev. Larr’s legacy.

Rev. Larr taught the virtues of looking inward and developing the self, and building awareness. Sisler’s own words, in Chapel Guardian opinion, are an example of the misinterpretation Rev. Larr most feared.

There is a difference between focusing on the self and being self-centered.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

More new Chapel of Awareness irony

 A Chapel Guardian observer knowldgeable of local politics picked up on this one:

Terry Hall --- who is in charge of the Friends' Chapel of Awareness web site and distributed misinformation and mean-spirited Internet posts against Pastor Ann Lorenzini (as established by public documents easily found in online searches and on the friendsofchapel blog) --- comments on a Coast News story about the inappropriateness of "trying to coerce your compliance by threatened legal action".

He should know of such tactics, given his involvement in and support of the vitriolic behavior, twisted facts, and legal action on the part of the Friends of Chapel in the last year.

The post can be found at:
http://thecoastnews.com/view/full_story/12281926/article-Op-Ed--Publisher-says-Review-seeks-to-control-ad-prices-in-Rancho-Santa-Fe?

Ironic, in Chapel Guardian opinion.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Chapel of Awareness "rummage sale"


Note to Guardian: Received a tip about a Craigslist post for Chapel's March 5 rummage sale. Interesting thing is the post which was dated February 28 was flagged for removal. Try the link on it and it goes to "This posting has been flagged for removal.". Usually these things are flagged for some kind of posting violation or questionable content. Seems to be a recurring issue with the new group's use of the web. Biggest unanswered question is where the money from these rummage sales is going? If its a Chapel event then it needs to state these are donations to Chapel. They never say that. If its not a Chapel event then they need to say that too. Imagine members trying to write off donations that actually aren't.